ORIGINAL  
Niger J Paed 2013; 40 (3): 264 –269  
Onubogu CU  
Ugochukwu EF  
Inter-pregnancy interval and  
pregnancy outcomes among HIV  
positive mothers in Nnamdi Azikiwe  
University Teaching Hospital,  
Nnewi, South-East Nigeria  
DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/njp.v40i3,12  
Abstract Background: Both short  
and long inter-pregnancy intervals  
have been associated with higher  
risk of adverse pregnancy  
outcomes. More so, short inter-  
pregnancy interval among HIV-  
positive women implies higher  
birth rate and subsequently a  
higher number of neonates  
exposed to HIV and potentially at  
ris k o f mo t her -to -c hi ld  
transmission.  
Aims: To study the influence of  
inter-pregnancy interval on  
pregnancy outcomes among  
booked HIV-positive mothers  
with singleton live-births at  
Nauth, Nnewi.  
Methods: A cross-sectional study  
was carried out with the aid of  
structured questionnaires,  
maternal clinical records and  
relevant anthropometry, between  
May and December 2011, among  
booked multiparous HIV-positive  
mother/singleton newborn pairs at  
NAUTH, Nnewi.  
Results: More than half (56.5%)  
of the 175 multiparous HIV-  
positive women studied had short  
inter-pregnancy interval (<18  
months). Short inter-pregnancy  
interval was significantly  
associated with adverse maternal  
and perinatal outco2mes like  
maternal anaemia (X =14.95,  
p=0.021) and low values of  
m a t e r n a l o r n e o n a t a l  
anthropometric parameters.  
However only adverse maternal  
outcomes and MAC/OFC ratio of  
t h e n e o n a t e s r e m a i n e d  
significantly associated with short  
Inter-pregnancy interval after  
logistic regression analysis. Long  
inter-pregnancy interval was  
significantly associated with low  
values of neonatal anthropometric  
parameters and maternal MAC less  
Onubogu CU  
Ugochukwu EF  
(
)
Department of Paediatrics  
Nnamdi Azikiwe University  
Teaching Hospital  
Nnewi, Nigeria  
E-mail: luvilyamy@yahoo.co.uk  
2
than 25cm (X =15.10, p=0.019) as  
well as third trimester weight gain  
2
rate less than 250g/week (X  
=31.20, p= 0.000). The proportion  
of mothers with long inter-  
pregnancy that had anaemia or  
intra-partum BMI less than 25kg/  
2
m differed only slightly from that  
of those with inter-pregnancy  
interval of 18-59 months.  
Conclusion: Inter-pregnancy  
interval of 18 to 59 months is  
significantly associated with the  
lowest risk of both adverse  
maternal and fetal outcomes  
among HIV-positive women.  
Introduction  
income countries with effective implementation of anti-  
retroviral prophylaxis during pregnancy, caesarean  
section delivery and avoidance of breastfeeding. On the  
4
HIV/AIDS continues to kill women, infants and young  
children especially in Sub-Saharan Africa with  
exceptionally high burden of HIV/AIDS. Young  
women remain disproportionately affected by HIV/  
AIDS and constitute 71% of215-24 year olds living with  
HIV in Sub-Saharan Africa. Above 90% of infections  
in children result from mother-to-child transmission  
contrary, MTCT rate is still very high in developing  
countries like Nigeria, where prevention of MTCT  
(PMTCT) coverage is still very limited and  
breastfeeding is essential for child survival. Only about  
18% of HIV-positive pregnant women receive effective  
1
5
,6  
anti-retrovirals for PMTCT in Nigeria. Nigeria’s  
MTCT rate is 33% with 75,000 new paediatric  
infections attributed to MTCT in 2010, and the country  
currently has the highest burden of MTCT as 2w,5ell as  
maternal deaths attributed to HIV/AIDS globally.  
(
MTCT) and without any intervention, 30-45% of HIV-  
positive pregnant women transmit the virus to 3their  
infants during pregnancy, delivery or breastfeeding.  
MTCT rate has diminished to less than 2% in high  
2
65  
Both long and short inter-pregnancy intervals have been  
associated with increased risk of poor perinatal and  
(IHVN).  
Approval for the study was obtained from the NAUTH  
Ethics Committee and written informed consent was  
obtained from all participating mothers. Subjects were  
booked, multiparous, HIV-positive mothers that had  
singleton live births at NAUTH, Nnewi together with  
their newborn infants. Those whose preceeding  
pregnancy ended in an abortion were excluded.  
maternal-15outcomes among the general population of  
8
women.  
Women who become pregnant within 18-59  
months after a preceeding delivery a8r-1e5 least likely to  
have adverse pregnancy outcomes. Shorter inter-  
pregnancy interval has been associated with low birth  
weight, premature delivery, intrauterine fetal 9d-e11ath, as  
well as higher risk of under-five mortality.  
Poor  
maternal outcomes like puerperal endometritis, ante-  
partum haemorrhage, anaemia, poor nutritional status  
and maternal death have als8,o9,1b1,e1e4,n16associated with short  
The mothers were interviewed with a pre-tested,  
interviewer-administered, semi-structured questionnaire  
to obtain relevant socio-demographic and obstetric  
information. A cross-check was made with the mothers’  
antenatal clinic record after data collection for further  
validation of the data. Mothers’ gestational age (GA)  
and weight at booking were obtained from their ante-  
natal records. Mothers’ variables were age, educational  
status, occupation, last menstrual period (LMP), date of  
last confinement, parity, GA at delivery and pregnancy  
complications like ante-partum haemorrhage,  
hypertensive disorders, pre-term premature rupture of  
membranes and gestational diabetes mellitus. The inter-  
pregnancy interval in months was obtained by  
subtracting the date of previo8u-1s0 confinement from LMP  
inter-pregnancy interval.  
Likewise, inter-  
pregnancy interval above 59 months has been associated  
with higher rates of gestational diabetes and  
hypertensive di8s,9orders in pregnancy as well as adverse  
fetal outcomes.  
Addressing inter-pregnancy interval among HIV-  
positive mothers is essential to achieving the “Global  
Plan” of eliminating MTCT and improving maternal  
health by year 2015 in view of the limited PMTCT  
coverage in developing countries and benefit2s,5 of optimal  
pregnancy spacing on maternal health. Adequate  
pregnancy spacing imply lo7w-1e5r fertility rate and ensures  
before the index pregnancy.  
Third trimester weight  
better pregnancy outcomes.  
This can be achieved by  
gain and duration of the weight gain was obtained by  
subtracting the first documented third trimester weight  
and the GA at which it was taken from the intra-partum  
weight and GA at delivery, respectively. The rate of  
third trimester weight gain in grammes(g) per week was  
calculated by dividing weight gained during third  
correct and consistent use of effective contraception,  
which by extension, reduces the number of babies  
exposed to HIV or potentially at risk of MTCT when7  
applied to populations of HIV-positive women.  
Unfortunately, this is often neglected in PMTCT  
7
18  
programmes. The need for contraception is even higher  
trimester by the duration of the weight gain. The socio-  
among non-breastfeeding HIV-positive mothers as  
ovulation may return as early as six weeks post-partum  
putting th7,e17m at risk of another pregnancy shortly after  
delivery.  
The current study was set out to examine the inter-  
pregnancy intervals of HIV-positive mothers as well as  
the relationship between inter-pregnancy interval and  
some pregnancy outcomes like low values of maternal  
or neonatal anthropometric parameters, low maternal  
economic status of the family was assessed based on the  
highest educational attainment and t9he occupation of  
1
both parents as described by Oyedeji. Mothers’ weight,  
height and mid-arm circumfere0 nce (MAC) were  
2
measured using standard methods. The maternal health  
indicators were Body Mass Index (BMI), MAC, third  
trimester weight gain rate, CD count, intra-partum  
4
packed cell volume(PCV) and pregnancy complications  
like ante-partum haemorrhage, hypertensive disorders,  
diabetes mellitus and premature rupture of membranes.  
For every neonate, GA assessment was carried out  
within 24 hours of birth using the Dubowitz GA  
assessment chart. This was cross-checked with GA  
calculated from mother’s LMP for further validation.  
Where discrepancy of more8 than two weeks occured, the  
CD  
4
count, maternal anaemia and occurence of  
pregnancy complications like hypertensive disorders,  
antepartum haemorrhage, premature rupture of  
membranes and diabetes mellitus.  
1
Dubowitz score was used.  
Methods  
Anthropometric assessment of the newborn infants was  
conducted as soon as pos20s,i2b1le within 24 hours of birth  
The infants were weighed  
A
cross-sectional questionnaire-based study was  
conducted to determine the effect of inter-pregnancy  
interval on some pregnancy outcomes among booked  
HIV-positive mother/singleton newborn baby pairs at  
Nnamdi Azikiwe University Teaching Hospital  
using standard methods.  
naked using an infant weighing scale (SALTER  
MODEL 180) which was checked daily for zero  
adjustment. Three measurements were1obtained and the  
2
(
NAUTH), Nnewi, Anambra state, South-Eastern  
mean recorded to the nearest 0.05kg. The length was  
Nigeria. NAUTH is a tertiary hospital that serves as the  
major obstetric referal centre for Anambra state and  
environs. The centre offers PMTCT services which is  
supported by the U.S. Presidential Emergency  
Programme for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) through the  
auspices of the Institute of Human Virology, Nigeria  
measured with the infant placed in a supine position on  
an infantometer. An assistant, while gently cupping both  
ears, held the infant’s head snugly touching the fixed  
head-piece so that the inner and outer canthi of the eyes  
were in the vertical plane. Using the left hand, the  
researcher gently pressed the knees firmly against the  
2
66  
board and with the right hand, apposed the movable  
foot-piece against the infant’s heel which was kept  
perpendicular to the board. Three measurements were  
obtained and recorded to the nearest 0.1cm. Occipito-  
frontal circumference (OFC) and MAC were measured  
with a flexible inelastic tape. For OFC, the tape was  
applied over the glabella, passed around the head at the  
same level on each side and over the occipital  
prominence, then pulled firmly to compress the hair.  
Three measurements were obtained and the mean  
recorded to the nearest 0.1cm. The MAC was measured  
at a level that was mid-way between the tip of acromion  
and olecranon on the left arm, with the elbow flexed to a  
right angle. The tape was wrapped snugly around the  
arm without compressing the underlying tissue. Three  
measurements were obtained and the mean recorded to  
the nearest 0.1cm. The anthropometric parameters of the  
neonates were birth weight, weight-for-GA, MAC/OFC  
ratio and ponderal index. Ponderal index was calculated  
using the formula : 100 x birth weight (in grammes)  
anthropometric parameters assessed in the neonates.  
There was no significant difference between the  
anthropometric parameters of neonates whose mothers  
had inter-pregnancy interval of 13 to 17 months and  
those whose mothers had inter-pregnancy interval of 18  
to 59 months. No pre-term delivery occured in mothers  
with inter-pregnancy intervals of 18–59 months  
compared to the other inter-pregnancy intervals. There  
was, however, no significant association between GA at  
delivery and inter-pregnancy interval.  
Table 1: Socio-demographic and obstetric characteristics of  
the mothers  
Maternal Characteristics  
Number  
(total=175)  
Percentage  
Inter-pregnancy interval (months)  
7
6
– 12  
29  
36  
34  
57  
19  
16.6  
20.5  
19.4  
32.6  
10.9  
1
3 – 17  
18 – 59  
59  
3
>
divided by cube of birth length (cm ).  
Data analysis was done with statistical package for  
social sciences (SPSS) software, version 17.  
Multinomial logistic regression analysis was used to  
determine the Odds Ratio (OR) of adverse pregnancy  
outcomes significantly associated with inter-pregnancy  
interval in Chi-square test. Probability (p) value of less  
than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.  
Social-Class  
High  
Middle  
Low  
8.6  
41.7  
49.7  
1
5
73  
87  
Educational status  
Tertiary  
Secondary  
Primary  
No formal education  
Marital status  
Married  
Single  
Widowed  
Divorced  
33  
18.9  
41.7  
39.4  
0.0  
73  
69  
0
165  
0
10  
0
94.3  
0.0  
5.7  
0.0  
Results  
Age (years)  
Out of a total of 777 mothers that had live births during  
the study period, 240 were HIV-positive. Among the  
HIV-positive mothers, 197 were multiparous. Twenty-  
two out of 197 mothers were excluded on account of  
multiple births, incomplete ante-natal records, history of  
abortion in preceeding pregnancy and refusal to give  
informed consent. Thus final analyses was done with  
data obtained from 175 multiparous HIV-positive  
mother/singleton newborn baby pairs.  
<
1
>
18  
8-35  
35  
0
141  
34  
0.0  
80.6  
19.4  
Parity  
Multiparous [>1]  
Grandmultiparous [ >5]  
135  
40  
77.1  
22.9  
High social class = Socio-economic classes I and II  
Middle social class = Socio-economic class III  
Low social class = Socio-economic class IV and V  
Some socio-demographic characteristics and obstetric  
parameters of the mothers are shown in Table 1. The  
mothers were predominantly from low and middle social  
classes. All of them were christians, aged 18 years or  
more and had at least primary school education. They  
were predominantly married women (94.3%). Inter-  
pregnancy interval ranged from three to 132 months  
with a mean of 21.51 + 18.45 (n=167) months. Inter-  
pregnancy interval in 8 extreme cases (outliers) were  
deselected while calculating the mean and standard  
deviation as they exerted undue leverage upon the  
initially obtained values which did not give a true  
representation of the mean inter-pregnancy interval for  
the studied population. Inter-pregnancy intervals of 18-  
Table 3 shows the relationship between inter-pregnancy  
interval and some maternal health indicators. Inter-  
pregnancy intervals of 12 months or less was  
significantly associated with the highest risk of low intra  
-partum BMI or MAC, 3rd trimester weight gain less  
than 250g per week and maternal anaemia while  
intervals of 18-59 months was associated with the  
lowest risk. Surprisingly, inter-pregnancy intervals of 12  
months or less was associated with the lowest risk of  
3
maternal CD  
4
count less than 250cells/mm although the  
association was not statistically significant. Though inter  
-pregnancy interval of 18-59 months had the least risk of  
pregnancy complications like hypertensive disorders,  
ante-partum haemorrhage, diabetes mellitus and  
premature rupture of membranes, the association was  
not statistically significant.  
5
9 months occured in 32.6% of cases.  
Table 2 shows the relationship between inter-pregnancy  
interval and some neonatal indices. Inter-pregnancy  
intervals of 12 months or less and above 59 months were  
2
67  
Table 2 : Relationship between inter-pregnancy interval and neonatal indices  
Characteristic  
Inter-pregnancy interval (months)  
2
<12  
13-17  
18-59  
>59  
Total (%)  
X
P-value  
0.000  
Birth weight  
1
4
7(26.2)  
8(73.8)  
4(11.8)  
30(88.2)  
0(0.0)  
4(7.0)  
47(82.5)  
6(10.5)  
6(31.6)  
9(47.4)  
4(21.0)  
31(17.7)  
134(76.6)  
10(5.7)  
<
2
>
2.5kg  
.5-3.9kg  
4kg  
27.86  
32.70  
0
(0.0)  
Weight-for-GA  
SGA  
AGA  
1
4
6(24.6)  
7(72.3)  
2(3.1)  
2(5.9)  
32((94.1)  
0(0.0)  
3(5.3)  
40(70.2)  
14((24.5  
4(21.1)  
10(52.6)  
5(26.3)  
25(14.3)  
129(73.7)  
21(12.0)  
0.000  
LGA  
Ponderal Index  
1
6(24.6)  
3(8.8)  
31(91.2)  
0(0.0)  
7(12.3)  
40(72.0)  
10(17.5)  
5(26.3)  
8(42.1)  
6(31.6)  
31(17.7)  
126(72.0)  
18(10.3)  
<
2.32  
.32-2.85  
2.85  
MAC/OFC ratio  
4
7(72.3)  
25.69  
13.29  
0.000  
0.004  
2
>
2
(3.1)  
26(40%)  
5(14.7)  
29(85.3)  
9(15.8)  
48(84.2)  
4(21.1)  
15(78.9)  
44(25.1)  
131(74.9)  
<
>
0.27  
0.27  
3
9(60%)  
GA at birth (weeks)  
<
>
37  
37  
4
1(93.8)  
(6.2)  
2(5.9)  
32(94.1)  
0(0.0)  
57(100)  
2(10.5)  
17(89.5)  
8(4.6)  
167(95.4)  
4.78  
0.188  
6
Total (%)  
65(37.1)  
34(19.4)  
57(32.6)  
19(10.9)  
175(100.0)  
SGA=small for gestational age, AGA=adequate for gestational age  
LGA=large for gestatioal age, GA=gestational age  
MAC= mid-arm circumference, OFC=occipito-frontal circumference  
Table 3: Effect of inter-pregnancy interval on maternal health  
Characteristic  
Inter-pregnancy interval(months)  
<12 13-17 18-59  
2
>59  
Total (%)  
X
p-value  
2
Intrapartum BMI (kg/m )  
18.5  
<
0(0.0)  
0(0.0  
0(0.0)  
6(10.5)  
24(42.1)  
27(47.4)  
0(0.0)  
2(10.5)  
8(42.1)  
9(47.4)  
0(0.0)  
35(20.0)  
84(48.0)  
56(32.0)  
1
2
8.5-24.9  
5-29.9  
21(32.3)  
33(50.8)  
11(16.9)  
6(17.6)  
19(55.9)  
9(26.5)  
20.07 0.003  
15.10 0.019  
>
30  
MAC(cm)  
25  
5-30  
30  
rd trimester weight gain  
250g/wk  
50-500g/wk  
500g/wk  
<
2
>
3
<
2
>
22(33.9)  
29(44.6)  
14(21.5)  
7(20.6)  
18(52.9)  
9(26.5)  
5(8.8)  
32(56.1)  
20(35.1)  
4(21.1)  
6(13.6)  
9(47.3)  
38(21.7)  
85(48.6)  
52(29.7)  
32(49.2)  
27(41.5)  
6(9.2)  
9(26.5)  
25(73.5)  
0(0.0)  
5(8.8)  
42(73.7)  
10(17.5)  
5(26.3)  
13(68.4)  
1(5.3)  
51(29.1)  
107(61.1)  
17(9.7)  
31.20 0.000  
14.95 0.021  
Intrapartum PCV(%)  
30  
0-32  
33  
CD  
250  
50-500  
500  
<
3
>
22(33.8)  
26(40.0)  
17(26.2)  
6(17.6)  
19(55.9)  
9(26.5)  
7(12.3)  
24(42.1)  
26(45.6)  
3(15.8)  
6(31.6)  
10(52.6)  
38(21.7)  
75(42.9)  
62(35.4)  
4
count  
<
2
>
4(6.1)  
23(35.4)  
38(58.5)  
4(11.8)  
16(47.1)  
14(41.1)  
5(8.8)  
26(45.6)  
26(45.6)  
2(10.5)  
9(47.4)  
8(42.1)  
15(8.6)  
74(42.3)  
86(49.1)  
4.03  
1.83  
0.671  
0.608  
Pregnancy Complications  
Yes  
No  
9(13.8)  
56(86.2)  
4(11.8)  
30(88.2)  
4(7.0)  
53(93.0)  
3(15.8)  
16(84.2)  
20(11.4)  
150(85.7)  
Total (%)  
65(37.1)  
34(19.4)  
57(32.6)  
19(10.9)  
175(100.0)  
2
68  
The result of logistic regression analysis for adverse pregnancy outcomes significantly associated with inter-pregnancy  
interval in chi-square test is shown in Table 4. The associations that remained statistically significant after logistic  
regression analysis were maternal anaemia and low anthropometric parameters as well as MAC/OFC ratio of the  
neonates.  
Table 4 : Result of logistic regression analysis for adverse pregnancy outcomes significantly associated with inter-pregnancy  
Characteristic  
Inter-pregnancy Interval (months)  
13-17  
<
12  
18-59  
>60  
OR  
95% C1  
OR  
95% CI  
OR  
95% CI  
OR 95% CI  
Intra-partum PCV < 30%  
MAC< 25cm  
3.35*  
0.69-16.23 1.51*  
0.96-18.99 1.56*  
0.22-9.98  
0.54  
0.48  
0.09-3.07  
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
4.26*  
0.27-8.81  
0.09-2.59  
0.11-5.71  
0.01-1.50  
2
Intrapartum BMI< 25kg/m  
10.42* 1.53-70.89 2.86*  
0.34-23.97 0.78  
Third trimester weight gain < 250g/  
week  
1.59*  
0.12-14.46 3.74*  
0.58-1.49  
0.12  
Low Ponderal index  
0.63  
0.16-2.50  
0.06  
0.01-0.68  
0.31  
0.07-1.36  
+
+
Low MAC/OFC  
SGA  
4.47*  
0.85  
1.05-19.07 1.00  
0.18-5.63  
0.25-0.98  
1.0  
0.19  
0.24-5.42  
0.36-0.98  
+
+
+
+
0.23-3.09  
0.25-2.39  
0.16  
0.29  
LBW  
0.77  
0.07-1.20  
0.16  
0.04-0.66  
+
+
+
CI=Confidence interval,  
=data insufficient for analysis,  
*=Statistically significant,  
LBW= Low birth weight,  
OR=Odds ratio,  
SGA=Small for gestational age,  
MAC=Mid-arm circumference,  
OFC= Occipito-frontal circumference, BMI=Body mass Index  
unfavourable outcome of preceeding pregnancy,  
underlying medical disorders, poor socio9--e1c1,o14n,1o6mic  
status, poor antenatal care or life-style factors.  
Discussion  
The effect of short inter-pregnancy interval on birth  
weight is believed to result from inadequate time for  
replenishment of maternal nutrient stores as well as  
recovery from the physiologic stress of pregnancy and  
lactation am12-o14ng women with close succession of  
The high prevalence of HIV infection (30.9%) found  
among parturients at NAUTH, Nnewi may be explained  
by the fact that NAUTH is the only obstetrics tertiary  
referal centre in Anambra state and has the largest  
PMTCT programme in the state. NAUTH as a centre for  
PMTCT caters for a considerable number of HIV-  
positive clients. Similar prevalence of 29.6% was  
documented in the same centre by a study conducted  
pregnancies  
Some hypothesis have been proposed to  
explain the relationship between long inter-pregnancy  
interval and adverse pregnancy outcomes. These include  
a
gradual post-partum regression of a woman’s  
reproductive c9a,1p6acity to become similar to that of a  
primigravidae. Another possible explanation is that  
long interpregnancy interval may be secondary to factors  
like chronic maternal diseases and genital tract infection  
which are risk factors for b9o,1t6h secondary infertility and  
adverse perinatal outcomes.  
2
2
about 1 year prior to the index study.  
Findings of the index study suggest a high rate of short  
inter-pregnancy intervals among HIV-positive women  
that enrolled for PMTCT at NAUTH, Nnewi as 56.5%  
of them had inter-pregnancy intervals less than 18  
months. The study, however, was not adequately  
powered to draw conclusions due to lack of comparison  
with HIV negative controls.  
The lack of significant association between short inter-  
pregnancy interval and neonatal anthropometric  
parameters like low birth weight, low ponderal index  
and weight-for-gestational age, after logistic regression  
analysis, suggests that short inter-pregnancy interval  
may interact with other factors in causing low values of  
these parameters. This may be explained by the fact that  
the fetus is an “obligate parasite” a2n3d may thrive on  
The obvious benefits of inter-pregnancy interval of 18-  
5
9 months in preventing some adverse maternal and  
perinatal outcomes, found in the index study, is  
consistent with the report of some studies co-n14ducted in  
6
both developing and developed countries. Most of  
limited maternal nutrient stores.  
However the  
these studies have shown that both short and long inter-  
pregnancy intervals are associated with adverse maternal  
and perinatal outcomes in all women irrespective of  
their HIV-status. Some authors sugested a “J” shaped  
relationship between inter-pregnancy interval and  
pregnancy outcomes with optimal outcome associated  
with an inter-pregnancy interval between 18,1-423 months  
significant relationship between short inter-pregnancy  
interval and MAC/OFC ratio suggests a late gestational  
weight loss in neonates whose mothe24s had inter-  
pregnancy interval of 12 months or less. Low MAC/  
OFC ratio has been assoc2i4ated with adverse perinatal  
outcomes among neonates.  
9
after adequately adjusting for confounders. However,  
The effects of inter-pregnancy interval on both maternal  
and neonatal health, found in this study, should provide  
a strong motivating force for PMTCT programmes and  
some authors have argued that short or long inter-  
pregnancy interval merely depicts women already at  
higher reproductive risks due to young age, high parity,  
2
69  
reproductive clinicians to address pregnancy spacing  
among HIV-positive women of child bearing age. All  
HIV-positive young women should be educated on the  
health and nutritional benefits of avoiding another  
pregnancy less than 18 months or above 59 months after  
child birth. PMTCT programmes should re-examine the  
extent of access to birth spacing services and ensure  
consistent and correct use of effective contraceptives by  
families who wish to achieve optimal pregnancy  
spacing. This will not only improve maternal health and  
child survival but will reduce the number of babies  
exposed to HIV and thus at risk of MTCT.  
Conclusion  
Inter-pregnancy interval of 18 to 59 months is  
significantly associated with the lowest risk of both  
adverse maternal and fetal outcomes among HIV-  
positive women.  
References  
1
2
.
.
The state of the world’s children  
012. New York: UNICEF; 2012  
accessed 2012 Dec. 10). Available  
from: http://www.unicef.org/  
sowc2012.  
WHO/UNAIDS/UNICEF. Global  
HIV/AIDS response: epidemic  
update and health sector progress  
towards universal access : progress  
report 2011. WHO; Geneva: 2011  
9. Zhu BP. Effect of inter-pregnancy  
18. Adebami OJ, Owa JA, Oyedeji GA,  
Oyelami OA, Omoniyi-Esan GO.  
Association between placental and  
cord blood malaria infection and  
fetal malnutrition and fetal  
malnutrtion in an area of malaria  
holoendemicity. Am J Trop Med  
Hyg 2007; 77 (2): 209-13.  
19. Oyedeji GA.Socioeconomic and  
cultural background of hospitalized  
children in Ilesa, Nigeria. Nig J  
Paediatr 1985; 12:111-7.  
20. Bruce Cogill. Anthropometric  
indicators measurement guide.  
Food and Nutrition Technical  
Assistance (FANTA) project,  
Academy for Educational  
Development. Washingon, DC:  
FANTA Project; 2003.  
21. Otaigbe BE, Alikor EAD,  
Nkanginieme KEO. Growth  
pattern of exclusively breastfed  
infants in the first 6 months of life:  
a study of babies delivered at the  
University of Port Harcourt  
Teaching Hospital, Rivers state,  
Nigeria. Niger J Med 2008; 17(3):  
317-23.  
22. Ezebialu IU, Ekeh AC, Ezeagwuna  
DA, Nwachukwu CE, Ifediata F,  
Ezebialu CU. Prevalence, pattern  
and determinants of malaria in a  
population of South-Eastern  
Nigerian parturients. Int J Infect  
Dis 2012; 16: e860-(accessed 2013  
Jan. 20). Available from  
www.elsevier.com/locate/ijid  
23. WHO. Physical status: the use and  
interpretation of anthropometry.  
Technical Report Series 854.  
Geneva: WHO; 1995.  
24. Georgieff SR, Sasanow UM,  
Chockalinge AM, Pereira GR. A  
comparison of the mid-arm  
circumference ratio and ponderal  
index for the evaluation of  
newborn infants after abnormal  
intrauterine growth. Acta Paediatr  
Scand 1988; 77: 214-9.  
2
(
interval on birth outcomes:  
findings from 3 recent US studies.  
Int J Gynecol Obstet 2005; 89: S25  
-33.  
10. Rutstein SO. Effects of preceeding  
birth intervals on neonatal, infant  
and under-five mortality and  
nutritional status in developing  
countries: evidence fro m  
demographic and health surveys.  
Int J Gynecol Obstet 2005; 89: S7-  
24  
11. Norton M. New evidence on birth  
spacing: promising findings from  
for improving newborn, infant,  
child and maternal health. Int J  
Gynecol Obstet 2005; 89: S1-S6.  
12. Adam I, Ismail MH, Nasr AM,  
Prins MH, Smits LM. Low birth  
weight, pre-term birth and short  
inter-pregnancy interval in Sudan.  
(accessed 2012 Nov.16). Available  
from:http://whqlibdoc.who.int./  
publications/2011/978924502986_  
eng.pdf.  
De Cock KM, Fowler MG, Mercier  
E, De Vincenzi I, Saba J, Hoff E,  
et al. Prevention of mother-to-child  
transmissions in resource poor  
countries: translating research into  
policy and practice. JAMA 2000;  
3
4
.
.
2
83: 1175-82.  
AIDSinfo. Panel on treatment of  
HIV-infected pregnant women and  
p r e v e n t i o n o f p e r i n a t a l  
transmission : recommendations  
for use of anti-retroviral drugs in  
pregnant HIV-infected women for  
maternal health and interventions  
to reduce perinatal HIV  
transmission in the United States.  
Updated 2012 July 31 (accessed  
J
Matern Fetal Neonatal Med  
2009; 22 (11): 1068-71.  
13. Zilberman B. Influence of short  
inter-pregnancy interval on  
pregnancy outcome. Harefuah  
2007; 146: 42-7.  
14. Zhu BP, Haines KM, Le T,  
McGrath-Miller K, Boulton MC.  
Effect of interval between  
pregnancy on perinatal outcomes  
among white and black women.  
Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001; 185:  
1403-10.  
2
013 Jan. 20). Available from  
http://aidsinfo.nih.gov/guidelines  
5
. UNAIDS. Together we will end  
AIDS 2012. UNAIDS; Geneva:  
2
012 (accessed 2012 Nov. 7) .  
Available from: www.unaids.org/--  
/unaids/---  
2012/20120718_togetherwewillen  
15. UNICEF/WHO/UNESCO/UNFPA/  
UNAIDS/UNDP/WORLD BANK.  
Facts For Life 2002. New York:  
UNICEF; 2002.  
-
/
daids_en.pdf.  
NACA/UNAIDS. United Nations  
General Assembly Special Session  
16. Conde-Agudelo A, Rosas-  
Bermudez A, Kafury-Goeta AC.  
Birth spacing and risk of adverse  
perinatal outcome: a meta analysis.  
JAMA 2006; 295 (15): 1809-23.  
17. Jackson E, Glasier A. Return of  
ovulation and menses in post-  
partum non-lactating mothers: a  
systematic review. Obstet Gynecol  
2001; 117 (3): 657-62.  
6
7
8
.
.
.
(
UNGASS) Country Progress  
Report: Nigeria. Abuja : NACA;  
010.  
2
USAID. Strengthening family  
planning policies and programmes  
in developing countries: an  
advocacy toolkit 2005. USAID;  
Washington DC: 2005.  
WHO. Report of  
a
WHO  
Technical Consultation on birth  
spacing, Geneva, Switzerland 2005  
June 13-15. Geneva: WHO; 2007.